Why The Left Needs To Worry About Pedogate, Part I

[kimberlysteele]

Hi Everyone, I decided to write about Pedogate this week instead of masks this Wednesday. I plan on discussing masks and what I believe they symbolize sometime soon, just not right now as I am fatigued by the subject for the moment.



In March 2016, the Pedogate avalanche began with Wikileak's release of over thirty thousand emails from Hillary Clinton's hacked email server. Many of these emails contained known code language pertaining to pedophilia. The resulting Pedogate scandal soon became linked to almost every celebrity, royal family member, and politician in the land, suggesting they were part of an enormous underground Satanic ritual abuse cult. To add insult to injury, the victims of this alleged worldwide network of supposed abusers were children, including babies.

Pedogate is the revival of the Satanic Panic of the 1980s, when every curious kid played his or her heavy metal records backwards trying to detect hidden messages between electric guitar solos. Like the Satanic Panic, there is a blanket assumption that Pedogate is pure, unwarranted hysteria and that anyone who believes in it is a tinfoil hat-wearing nutter. This sort of blanket dismissal, despite compelling evidence such as the CIA's own Finder's Cult documents, the Franklin scandal, the Laura Silsby case, and Jeffrey Epstein's "gift" of twelve year old triplets from a still at-large Jean-Luc Brunel, lend support to the notion that powers that be are desperate to hide their own nasty habits, and that they are willing to resort to elaborate, media-assisted coverups to shield the ugly truth.

According to Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) survivors, underground Satanic cults have been doing their thing while hidden in plain sight since the age of the pyramids. No one is safe: even Ronald Reagan has been called out by an SRA survivor by the name of Cathy O'Brien. Supposedly Watergate was the original Pedogate, with the Nixon administration desperate to hide all they had achieved via honeytraps and other nefarious forms of blackmail.

Courting The Law of the Forbidden

Mention Pedogate in polite society and you will be immediately shut down. Pedogate is conflated with anti-Semitism because its promulgators don't shy away from pointing out the disproportionate number of Jewish people embedded within the entertainment, banking, and legal industries. Is everyone who believes in Pedogate an anti-Semite? I say no. A similar question would be: Is every Christian an anti-Semite? After all, Christians believe that Jews killed Jesus and have used that excuse to justify violence against Jews for centuries.  By the same bifurcation fallacy, all Christians can be conveniently tarred with an anti-Semitic brush. Muslims as well can be uniformly labeled as anti-Semites if one uses the bifurcation fallacy.

By censoring all discussion of Pedogate, the inevitable result is to make Pedogate more appealing. In an ironic turn of fate, when polite society refuses to openly discuss Pedogate, it is subject to what Satanist Anton LaVey called the Law of the Forbidden. The Law of the Forbidden states that there is nothing more appealing than that which is not meant to be seen, and the forbidden is much more enticing than that which is obvious and "thrown into our faces". Pedogate could just be the result of imaginations running wild. I believe there is some truth to Pedogate, as evidenced by the examples I quoted above as well as Jimmy Savile's posthumously exposed crimes. I draw the line though when I am expected to believe that every royal, celebrity, and politician eats human infants and feces in a Satanic ritual setting before transforming into their final lizard form. Vile perverts exist in low and high places. Some of them are organized, some are not. I personally don't believe every single sitcom star, high ranking clergyman, Instagram influencer, and politician from presidential to local is involved in SRA. But just as there are heroin and crack dealers in the "nice" suburbs (hoity toity Naperville, Illinois is one of the heroin capitals of the free world), pedophile rings are similarly a dime a dozen.

The Class War: It's A Bad Time To Be A Celeb

Podesta did himself no favors by showing off his art collection. Alefantis should have thought twice before hitting the "publish" prompt of his Instagram. Despite all of his Oscars for knowing how to act, Tom Hanks wasn't clever enough to understand how badly his bizarre photographs of lost shoes would be interpreted, especially in light of accusations from Sarah Jane Ashcroft.

Guilt and innocence aside, the three men above demonstrate a broader trend in leftist culture to elevate the status of the absurd and/or the grotesque to high art with room for little else. Art has become the inaccessible stomping ground of elites who use works by questionable talents to wealth signal via gestures of obtuse abstraction. In other words, the arts today (this includes filmmaking, architecture, music, and visual art) are the premier field where snobs weaponize vague meaninglessness and titillating shock value so they can impress other snobs.  This is done with the intended side effect of mystifying/terrorizing the general public.

Elites have retreated into an insulated world of intellectual glitterati. From this hallowed place, they make both documented and implied rules by which to control the unwashed, contemptible people of whom they are afraid. Donald Trump is appealing to the deplorables because he -- with his golden toilets and tragic combover -- is what a deplorable born into wealth looks like. He is a hero to the deplorables who are a class who perceive themselves as increasingly oppressed and parasitized by the middle and upper classes.

You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork. And just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly sh***ier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime and vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it, and now they're coming for your Social Security money. They want your f***in' retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street, and you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later cause they own this f***in' place. It's a big club and you ain't in it.

-George Carlin

Why Pedogate?

The upper classes from the comfortable middle class all the way up to the high .001 of yacht and private jet owners deny there is a class war.  This is the same class war, however, that defines our times.  Pedogate, like almost every other contentious subject these days, is about class conflict.  Pedogate makes it easy to paint any member of the comfortable classes as a dirty, kiddy-diddling devil worshipper. Keep in mind there is a perception within Pedogate circles that every one percenter has been initiated into a Satanic cannibal cult, and it is a belief that is far from uncommon.

Nobody is willing to mention that since the 1970s, class tensions have been escalating due to the disenfranchisement of the lower classes as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.  In the West, the uprising of nationalist populism around the globe seemed to coalesce in an exclamation point with the election of Donald Trump and Brexit. 

Brexit and Trump didn't happen in a vacuum.  By the late 2010s, it was self-evident that the lower classes were tired of being looked down upon. This showed up in notable instances of popular culture rebellion in the 1990s: South Park's initial seasons mercilessly lampooned too-big-to-fail celebrities like Marlon Brando, Kathie Lee Gifford, and Sally Struthers.  South Park was aped in its savage caricatures of the rich and famous by The Family Guy.  Twenty plus years later, television itself has become irrelevant but cruelly roasting celebrities has not.  CrazyDaysandNights.net, a site by an anonymous person who alleges to be an entertainment lawyer, raised eyebrows with its brutal exposés of celebrity debauchery.  Over time, it wasn't entirely clear that power, physical beauty, and riches were awarded to the deserving via an inscrutable system of quasi-Calvinist randomness. As our culture ran off its postmodern rails, decorum went the way of driving gloves and whalebone corsets. Celebrities and political leaders became fair game in a vicious war.  The bigger they are, the harder they fall.  Take John Legend and his wife, Chrissy Teigen.  Both have been disgraced for their association with Marina Abramović, an apparently talent-free Serbian performance artist who reenacts every gory detail of Satanic ritual in a museum theater context except for literal baby eating, and we're not entirely sure about that.  Teigen, a compulsive Twitter addict and chronic motormouth, often babbles about how turned on she is by the children's pageant reality show Toddlers and Tiaras and once seemed to let on that she and Legend had a sordid ménage à quatre with the Obamas.  

The belief in Pedogate sates a hunger that is extremely dangerous to leave unexamined, unrecognized, and unaddressed.  The lower classes (which also includes people with money who lack the sophistication or desire to fit into upper class social circles, for instance, Donald Trump) don't see themselves as inferior to the upper classes.  For the most part, the lower classes just want to live their lives.  Of course the upper classes won't leave the lower classes alone; that would be like asking a swarm of mosquitoes to stop feeding on mammalian blood.

The lower classes resent the interference and being parasitized by the classes above them and resentment has reached an all-time high.  Enter Pedogate.  By characterizing the upper classes as unpunished Satanic pedophiles who participate directly or indirectly in SRA of children, the People of Walmart can immediately perceive themselves as superior to those who sneer.  Pedogate takes away the classiness of the upper class and reveals them to be a lower life form than pond scum.  The sneerers become the sneered at.  Better to be downtrodden, eccentric, sloppy, broke, and fat than to be a gorgeous, rich, Adrenochrome-addicted pedophile.

Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.

If the criteria for rich people to go to heaven are hard to meet, then rich pedophiles don't have a snowball's chance in the place where Christians would assign them after death. Pedogate is how an elite class, once loved and if not loved, at least feared and respected, ends up as a bunch of severed heads on an iron fence. These days, celebrities, royals, politicians, and newscasters act in a way I view as openly suicidal.  Ellen Degeneres may be worth 330 million, but that won't matter to a raging mob if evidence pops up, no matter how shoddy, that she has mistreated children.  Hillary Clinton is one of the most hated people on a planet with more than enough hatred to dish out.  If compelling evidence surfaces of what she is suspected of doing to children, it won't take a court of law in a country with a death penalty to earn her an immediate execution... if she's lucky.  Firing squads are easy compared to what certain factions would like to do to her.  Personally, I'm a fan of innocent until proven guilty.  Our system of punishment is garbage but innocent until proven guilty is not one of its flaws.  

The Way The Left Sees Itself Versus How They Are Seen

Prince Andrew most likely saw young Virginia Giuffre as a high class prostitute.  In his class, other people are automatons born to serve and to be used.  What Pedogate condemns as depraved acts forced upon a child, Prince Andrew and his ilk see as normal business as usual.  Prince Andrew was never trained to perceive the significance of emotion as demonstrated by other human beings.  It is likely he saw Guiffre's forced smile as evidence of enthusiastic consent, age be damned.  Life for Prince Andrew was a great big party until getting old and getting caught conspired to end his fun.

Leftists and liberalism err on the side of the permissive.  The free love era of the 1960s ushered in a loosening of the limits of heterosexual marriage, an openness to drug experimentation, and the exploration of non-Christian religions, including the religion of Marxism: the belief in a socialist utopia that has never actually been achieved by socialism.  Unfortunately, Marxism is back in vogue at the moment and in true liberal fashion, there is a rush to erase its limits and apply it as a one size fits all, final solution to those problematic masses of people who do not agree with Marxists.

The Left is not helped by the way it sees religion.  To the Left, sincere belief in God/gods is a foreign phenomenon to be made fun of, othered, or museum-displayed for profit.  The Left is also fascinated by Satanism.  

Help Wanted: Adversary to Boost Legitimacy of Failing Religion

Christianity isn't doing so hot.  American Christianity has lost credibility within the last hundred years and is a shadow of what it was at the turn of the twentieth century.  The Left as it currently exists provides the perfect adversary to strengthen what is left of a feeble, increasingly irrelevant religion.  Pedogate is a force majeure in a war the Left cannot admit it is fighting.  Christianity needs Pedogate.  There's nothing like a Satanic Panic to get warm butts into chilly church pews. 

Pedogate, with its obsession with accusing adults of molesting and killing infants, naturally lends itself to the more indiscriminate side of the pro-life movement, which prioritizes the life of the unborn fetus well above that of the mother who is but a mere vessel for delivering the precious infant into the world.  Pedogate makes it easy to demonize a pregnant mother, who can be caricatured as a cartoonishly evil idiot who would offer her newborn up to elite Ba'al worshippers to make a quick buck.  This further dehumanizes the expectant mom in a way that is astoundingly convenient if you are running a clandestinely for-profit Christian adoption mill like the one I was born in forty-seven years ago, the type of which still proliferates today. 

As long as Christianity remains the refuge of hypocrites and spiritually insensitive know-nothings who nonetheless scream at the top of their lungs that everyone who does not follow in their footsteps will burn in eternal hell, it will need Pedogate to prove there is an evil out there worse than itself.  Christianity needs Pedogate in order to make itself seem more appealing and less secular, especially when honest, Jesus-loving Christians rightfully question the failings of an increasingly materialist, downright atheist set of approaches to worship.  Desperation is palpable in the Christian right; desperation scares off potential converts.  Pedogate scares them back into the arms of a failing religion. 

Less than forty short years ago, the Christian right dominated the scene in the way the Left dominates now.  Christians used their considerable power and influence to imprison suspected pedophiles, not all of whom were proven guilty.

The rise of Pedogate could be the advent of Terrors with a capital "T" for the Left.  Considering the punishment the Left has dealt to by attempting to crush populism, crashing the economy by overreacting to COVID, and cheering on riots, looting, and murder in the name of BLM and Antifa, one could say they had it coming. 

Instead of ignoring Pedogate and threatening all who don't shove it under the rug, I think leftists would do well to start paying attention.  

In Part II of this series, I'll be discussing how I believe Pedogate should be dealt with.  

Comments

Thank you

[(Anonymous)]

Hi Kimberly, thanks for sharing this. I have been following Pedogate and actually had seen Pizzagate when it was making the rounds in 2016. I agree with you, the Left and elites should be more concerned about it, regardless of the veracity of the totality of accusations. There are some experiences which credible victims have shared (some of which you alluded to) which really, REALLY deserve to be taken seriously and investigated, as we've now seen with the Epstein / Maxwell cases. I can't understand how people on the Left continue to be so quick to shoot down the truth of child trafficking when we do know that pedophile rings continue to exist based on actual arrests and discoveries that have been confirmed. It strikes me as incredibly unscientific and cultish to immediately shut down the conversation without even an admission that an investigation would at least be in order. "Chrissy Teigan made fun of her Pedogate accusers, so it must not be real!" is by no means persuasive for anyone with a rational brain and who read her sick tweets. And I'm not even saying she's actually a pedophile but she has publicly said things I've never heard any normal functioning person say about sexual attraction to children, so there's something off with her regardless. I expect that this all is still just the beginning. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this, be well xoxo k

Re: Thank you

[kimberlysteele]

You're welcome -- I have noticed the most moderate, reasonable people in every other respect are still prone to censor any talk about Pedogate without mercy, because their theory states if you dare to mention Pedogate, you are immediately and automatically falsely accusing innocent adults of pedophilia. Why is that?

NOT talking about it makes it far worse, especially since the Epstein/Maxwell snowball keeps getting larger and mainstream media squashes all but a small portion of the discussion. It has now been revealed that Bill Clinton was on the island several times.

Not all Pedogate researchers are sloppy, either. Some of them have FAR higher journalistic standards than mainstream media -- Amazing Polly, Really Graceful, Tim Pool, Tarl Warwick, and Shaun Attwood spring to mind. There are more. The aforementioned are far more level-headed and trustworthy than the wretched boobs and stooges at CNN.

Chrissy Teigen seems damaged. I agree, who even talks about that? I feel sorry for her children. At best, they are growing up in a harsh spotlight with a mother who has chronic diarrhea of the mouth. At worst, they are being subjected to hideous abuse. May they be blessed.

Re: Thank you

[houseofmirrors]

I don't recall specific research videos from Tarl regarding the subject, but with that many videos per day and the subject matter I'm sure he'd have made at least a few videos rambles about the subject. I don't normally watch the Occult series videos, so that is a possible place it could have slipped.

The Mouthy Buddah videos on the subject were probably the best produced I recall.

Re: Thank you

[lincoln_lynx]

Yeah, I've followed him for a while, and I saw no videos where he researched it. Commented yes, researched no.

Re: Thank you

[(Anonymous)]

Kimberly thank you for the researcher recommendations, I already do follow Tim Pool, I will definitely look into the others you mentioned! Funny how real journalism seems to mostly only be happening on an individual basis at this point. Very appreciated :) be well!

Re: Thank you

[kimberlysteele]

Jimmy Dore always says that it's odd that he, a "jag-off stand up comic", is a more trustworthy journalist than anyone in the mainstream media, yet here we are.

Re: Thank you

[(Anonymous)]

My guess is that a lot of them think it's fine once the younger partner hits puberty, but can't admit to it, either to themselves or to the world; so you did falsely accuse someone of pedophilia, because there's very few who actually seem to be into prepubescents.

And if your bar is "Better than CNN" I hate to say it but it'll be hard to find anyone who can't top that!

Re: Thank you

[kimberlysteele]

It's also a common leftist thing where they have an inability or unwillingness to draw limits/discriminate, and they think because they lost their virginity at age 13 or wanted sex at that age, that it must be OK because they "came out fine". They don't want to contemplate the idea that laws could be there for a good reason. At the same time, they love to castigate and doxx their enemies for politically incorrect speech, so there is both looseness and overreach where law is concerned. The blowback they create via this sort of hypocrisy is severe.

Reading the side of the ice cream truck is pretty much more accurate than CNN at this point. At least the side of the ice cream truck doesn't try to gaslight you and tell you rioting is peaceful and magically doesn't spread the flu.

Re: Thank you

[kimberlysteele]

Not all Pedogate researchers are sloppy, either. Some of them have FAR higher journalistic standards than mainstream media -- Amazing Polly, Really Graceful, Tim Pool, Tarl Warwick, and Shaun Attwood spring to mind

Aggh, now I realize why people think I was saying Tarl Warwick is a Pedogate researcher. My bad! He is NOT a researcher of Pedogate as far as I know, and Tim Pool is also NOT known for delving into Pedogate research. What I meant to say is that Tarl Warwick is a better journalist than anyone you'll find in the mainstream media, despite the fact he cusses like a sailor on shore leave.

Re: Thank you

[methylethyl]

Oddly, casual vulgarity is getting to be a mark of integrity in the new journalism. You'll notice Joe Rogan is probably the most trusted interviewer on the planet now...

[(Anonymous)]

"Donald Trump is appealing to the deplorables because he -- with his golden toilets and tragic combover -- is what a deplorable born into wealth looks like." Nailed it.

[(Anonymous)]

I suspect that a sizable portion of the left is actually into pedophilia, or at very least, hebephilia or ephebophilia (interest in early pubescents/late adolescents respectively). I make this claim based on two factors: the first is the bizarre reaction when Pedogate cames up, and the second is that if you look at what's popular on porn sites, they skew very, very strongly to the younger side of things, to the point where I'm quite convinced most mainstream porn sites could and should be shutdown for child porn. The girls may not be nude, but sometimes they're very close, and if those videos/images appear on a porn site, what does it tell you?

What I find fascinating is that bringing the porn issue up tends to get nods of agreement from the right and shrieking denunciations from a a lot of the left. I think it's likely a sign they're into it, and the sole reason why most of them aren't having sex with teenagers is that they don't think they can get away with it.

[lincoln_lynx]

Eh, I see that as simple tribalism.

[kimberlysteele]

Leftists of a certain age were all about free love back in the day, which is a euphemism for drug and alcohol fueled orgies in the suburbs. Nothing was off-limits, and that included post-pubescent children, I'd imagine. In Hollywood, the party never stopped like it did out here in the suburbs -- in fact, it's still how show business deals are sealed. Happy-go-lucky sexual freedom leftists don't see themselves as menacing. Since they were happy hookers and gigolos and still retain their horniness at 60, they figure the younger generation is making mountains out of molehills: they're uptight. Leftists of that horny stripe only went along with the motions of #metoo because they try not to make waves in the party and ape MSNBC talking points. They don't believe it could get them executed. They wouldn't believe it even when the noose was being slipped around their neck.

[houseofmirrors]

Assuming that it's just the left that is into or responsible for porn of any stripe and its consumption is simply wrong. Enough right wing and republican faces have egg all over them after their own hypocrisy that it does not follow that you can make this a left/right preference.

This list is being circled around as related to Ghislane Maxwell's list, which itself doesn't appear to be true at all, but the cases in the list all did occur and range in age from recent to a decade old. Note that this is not just "left wing" purpetrators.

http://archive.is/Ojz0l

[kimberlysteele]

it does not follow that you can make this a left/right preference.

And that's why I never did any such thing. The Franklin scandal that I mentioned in the second paragraph was a largely Republican one. And another prominent mention... Cathy O'Brien's implication of Ronald Reagan, so, yeah. Of course the Left isn't solely responsible for pornography or child trafficking. I'm just framing this so readers might understand how leftist messages and behaviors are already being warped all out of proportion in order to create convenient scapegoats. These leftist scapegoats will be punished for crimes committed by leftists, rightists, and centrists all.

[methylethyl]

I think in a weird way, there's a lot of truth to the pedogate stuff, just like with any other conspiracy theory: most of the details are wrong, and there are lots of totally unjustifiable leaps of fancy. But at the same time... all the most far-out details wrap themselves around a basic story that is probably true: the extremely wealthy, the power-elite, the glitterati, etc, have lost all sense of obligation to those lower in the hierarchy (however you define that hierarchy: wealth, fame, power, access), and have no problem with exploiting people who don't have the resources to take them to court. They get away with things that the rest of us would do serious jail time for, and we see it in the news over and over and over again: famous pretty person gets drunk and runs over a nobody with their sports car. Gets probation. Famous person caught with drugs. Not prosecuted. Famous person's employee or assistant turns up dead. Nobody is ever arrested for it. Famous person drugs and anally rapes a 13-year-old, moves to Europe, lives the high life for decades, makes an Oscar-winning movie that everyone gushes about. And everyone with half a brain has figured out by now why child actors and music stars are such screwed-up adults.

We all know that if WE go to a party where everyone is doing drugs and consorting with hookers, there's a good chance we'll end up with a permanent record that will prevent us ever getting a decent job again. We all also know that if you're Hollywood, this is normal, everyone shrugs it off, and even if you don't partake, silence is the cost of your continued employment. Everyone's complicit, to some degree.

The basic founding myth of our republic is that everyone is equal under the law. The more obvious it becomes that fame and money exempt you from real consequences, the greater the pool of resentment. Adding in schlock details like SRA turns the whole thing into an exciting pulp novel that everyone secretly wants to read. It gives a unified narrative to an otherwise nebulous collection of more-prosaic injustices.

There's a certain amount of C.S. Lewis' Inner Ring idea at work, on both sides. The ultra-wealthy tend to hang out with each other. Everyone slightly lower in status wants to be part of their club, and will excuse any kind of bad behavior as long as they keep getting invited to the right parties, schmoozing with the people who could make their careers... everyone keeps each others' secrets to stay in the in-crowd. Doing a tell-all interview, or filing a police report, would obviously get you booted out. Ever wonder what happened to Brendan Fraser's movie career? He was groped by the president of the HFPA and *didn't* just laugh and go to bed with the guy.

Down here in regular-people world, we don't know all the sordid details, because the first rule of celebrity club is: don't talk about celebrity club. But we can all tell that the club exists, that there's some skeezy stuff going on there, and that we're not invited. People are gonna fill in whatever details they think fit. Probably the baby-murdering and blood-drinking is fantasy, and the panic-mongering about massive numbers of stranger abductions certainly is (nobody really wants to look at the fact that most trafficked kids are trafficked by their parents). But rich people exploiting kids from poor backgrounds for sex? That's in the court documents. It not that hard to go from "These people all know each other, protect each other, and they can get away with anything" to "These people are doing the most evil thing I can imagine."

I think you're right that this is way more dangerous to those accused than they think it is.

[methylethyl]

...and also note that in reading some of the pedogate stuff, that there is a certain triumphant glee in the idea (true or not) that Trump, while wealthy, is not part of that club, and is marching in with a sledgehammer to bust up the party.

[kimberlysteele]

Leftists always insist Trump is in on it, but then in usual untidy fashion, conveniently forget that Trump permanently kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago after Epstein hit on a Mar-A-Lago member's teenage daughter. Trump also claims Epstein wasn't a member of Mar-A-Lago, but that seems dubious.

[kimberlysteele]

Leftists have made it extremely easy to suspect they are part of a Satanic cabal. I'm going to talk about this more in the second installment of this essay, but this whole thing kicked off when the Democrats cheated Bernie Sanders out of the 2015 primary. Who did they try to put into the presidential seat? Why, none other than Hillary Clinton, whose poop-eating grin may very well be the last thing a trafficked little girl saw before she was mutilated and eaten alive. Considering how long the Clinton Body Count list extends, the Clinton's corrupt dealings in Haiti, the shady sources of Clinton Foundation money, and the many accounts of Hillary's alcohol abuse and temper tantrums behind the scenes, it doesn't take an enormous leap of faith to suspect Hillary Clinton or her husband of next level demonic depravity.

Now take some random young Christian woman from the poor side of town. Her father did a turn in prison and she has worked a long string of fast food jobs. Let's say her latest one was a Wendy's, a Wendy's that was at first closed by leftist COVID paranoia and then torched by leftist riots. She just found a video that rightly blames Clinton and Obama for the policies that put her dad in the prison system. All it takes is a Youtube video and she is red pilled. The Left has less than nothing to offer her, except perhaps safe and legal abortion, but she's not interested.

[methylethyl]

For what it's worth, "Christians" doesn't leap out at me in the stuff I've run across. I get that having satanism as a boogeyman does by definition require at least a vague Christian cultural background, though.

What's weird to me is how *long* the SRA etc. stuff has been around: as you point out, it's a descendant of the 80s Satanic Panic, and it never really went away... I remember stumbling across the weirdest paranoid schizo internet fantasy back in the early 2000s, involving Natalie Portman. What's freaky is that the tale has changed very little since then, it's just that the characters have all been replaced with high-ranking politicians and Hollywood celebrities, conveniently provided by Epstein's flight logs. Same story. Different names plugged in. Even used the same creepy artwork to illustrate it.

The whole thing does seem to be absorbing all the natural "global elite vs. the peasantry" energy and animosity out there, and could prove very combustible, particularly given the plummeting public trust in conventional news sources.

[houseofmirrors]

part of a Satanic cabal

Speaking of sloppy research, I found the Fall Cabal documentary series by that dutch anon on BitChute. It seriously demeans the argument's credibility when the documentary creator does the same thing cancel culture leftists do by stripping all context, nuance, and situation from its wild speculations.

Anyone who was alive during the GWB's presidency would look at an actor, playing the role of Dick Cheney and his cronies saying "I would like to thank Satan for his inspiration on playing this role" as a jab at Cheney and his cronies, insinuating that their actions and motivations are inspired by Satan, and not an honest pean to the lord of darkness. There's enough actual smoke and fire that you don't have to reach this hard, or check your sense of humor and your memory of the past 15 years at the door, if indeed you ever had one.

Luciferian cabal

[(Anonymous)]

If you check out vigilantcitizen and henrymakow websites you will find out the elites are into Luciferianism, Satanism and various occult stuff. Many churches have been infiltrated by mk ultraed (trauma induced multiple personalities) pastors to corrupt Christianity such as Billy Graham. To get favors such as large government contracts, parents had given their children to the elite for sex who then wiped out their memories.

Check out Fiona Barnett, an Australian satanic ritual abuse survivor who was abused by Nicole Kidman's father.


Elites have sex with children and teens (because they were brainwashed to enjoy that or they want to join the gang or they believe in sex magick) and the cabal tapes that as blackmail.

[(Anonymous)]

Roseann Barr has a you tube account where she drops alot of information.........

[kimberlysteele]

They cancelled her to display their power and because she couldn't hold them over a barrel. The producers of South Park must have dirt on someone -- nothing else explains what they've been able to get away with.

The Left will come to sincerely regret cancelling Barr's show, if only in hindsight.
It a very bad move. It made them look extremely guilty and only served to hasten the death of television's popularity.