What beautiful photos! I particularly love the lake/river area.
My other discussion point is a little more somber though - do you remember a few weeks ago that I did a quick calculation that if the vaxes were even moderately fatal over the longer-term, it could result in a 70% reduction in the UK population?
Well someone posted on JMG's corona forum the other day and referenced something called a "Deagle forecast". So I had to look up what that was.
As I am inclined to do, I got mildly obsessive over this for a few days, and basically, Deagle is/was an advisory body both from and to the US military and intelligence agencies. Though they state their predictions come from 'forecasting trends' and other such vagaries, there is reasonably good evidence to believe that they actually did some form of remote-viewing to find out the populations of most countries around the world in 2025. These lists were created first in 2014, then revised in 2017, before abruptly being removed from the website in early 2020.
Many countries show a significant decrease in population, including the US, Canada, Australia, most European nations and the UK. The main determining factor appears to be US-allied countries, which also happen to be all the countries which have used mRNA vaxes (as opposed to viral-vector type vaxes). Going deeper into the numbers, the UK is supposed to see a 65% reduction in population, down to 15 million. I note that this is alarmingly close to the 70% figure I quoted above from my calculation, but that was over a 20 year span, not a mere 3 more years!
Wars, famines and even other plagues would not account for the countries which show the population declines, as you'd expect even a limited-scale nuclear exchange to reduce the population of Russia and US-allied Japan, both of which showed only a small reduction (and both of which have only minimally used mRNA vaxes). Although, it should be noted, that the population of North Korea is supposed to drop to zero!
Concerning stuff. It could all just be some form of weird disinformation campaign, but why remove it in 2020 if so?
Here is an archived version of the forecast from 2014: https://archive.ph/g7fjh
Here is an article on the 2017 numbers: https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/deagel-2025-population-and-output-forecast-revisited-essential-guide/
And here is an interview discussing the later version of it: https://internationalman.com/articles/doug-casey-on-the-shocking-2025-deagel-forecast/
I, like Mr. Crow, also believe they used remote viewing to generate these forecasts. It's some pretty terrifying stuff especially since the numbers for the USA and the UK predict 70%+ drops from 2014 population numbers. If these numbers are accurate then it strongly suggests that there is an additional factor beyond the mRNA injections that is impacting populations since vaccine uptake doesn't translate directly to reduced populations. Or it could suggest that in the countries where the reductions are the highest people actually received the injections they lined up for...
Population forecasts
Date: 2022-09-02 01:43 pm (UTC)What beautiful photos! I particularly love the lake/river area.
My other discussion point is a little more somber though - do you remember a few weeks ago that I did a quick calculation that if the vaxes were even moderately fatal over the longer-term, it could result in a 70% reduction in the UK population?
Well someone posted on JMG's corona forum the other day and referenced something called a "Deagle forecast". So I had to look up what that was.
As I am inclined to do, I got mildly obsessive over this for a few days, and basically, Deagle is/was an advisory body both from and to the US military and intelligence agencies. Though they state their predictions come from 'forecasting trends' and other such vagaries, there is reasonably good evidence to believe that they actually did some form of remote-viewing to find out the populations of most countries around the world in 2025. These lists were created first in 2014, then revised in 2017, before abruptly being removed from the website in early 2020.
Many countries show a significant decrease in population, including the US, Canada, Australia, most European nations and the UK. The main determining factor appears to be US-allied countries, which also happen to be all the countries which have used mRNA vaxes (as opposed to viral-vector type vaxes). Going deeper into the numbers, the UK is supposed to see a 65% reduction in population, down to 15 million. I note that this is alarmingly close to the 70% figure I quoted above from my calculation, but that was over a 20 year span, not a mere 3 more years!
Wars, famines and even other plagues would not account for the countries which show the population declines, as you'd expect even a limited-scale nuclear exchange to reduce the population of Russia and US-allied Japan, both of which showed only a small reduction (and both of which have only minimally used mRNA vaxes). Although, it should be noted, that the population of North Korea is supposed to drop to zero!
Concerning stuff. It could all just be some form of weird disinformation campaign, but why remove it in 2020 if so?
Mr. Crow
Re: Population forecasts
Date: 2022-09-02 09:53 pm (UTC)Re: Population forecasts
Date: 2022-09-04 09:42 am (UTC)Here is an archived version of the forecast from 2014:
https://archive.ph/g7fjh
Here is an article on the 2017 numbers:
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/deagel-2025-population-and-output-forecast-revisited-essential-guide/
And here is an interview discussing the later version of it:
https://internationalman.com/articles/doug-casey-on-the-shocking-2025-deagel-forecast/
I, like Mr. Crow, also believe they used remote viewing to generate these forecasts. It's some pretty terrifying stuff especially since the numbers for the USA and the UK predict 70%+ drops from 2014 population numbers. If these numbers are accurate then it strongly suggests that there is an additional factor beyond the mRNA injections that is impacting populations since vaccine uptake doesn't translate directly to reduced populations. Or it could suggest that in the countries where the reductions are the highest people actually received the injections they lined up for...
Thank you for allowing this kind of discussion.
-MF