Scary. My friend's daughter is pregnant and got the fox. She's a nurse, and wasn't going to get the fox, but was hearing a lot of stories of pregnant women struggling with COVID. She did wait until her second trimester, thinking that would be safer. Yet...on top of this, she has come down with COVID. Her home test is positive, and she is now waiting on the results from the testing center. She says she still won't allow her two other children to be foxed, though the state has started foxing those under 12 now.
As for the foxed, who are still coming down with COVID...they will find one way or another to blame it on us holdouts. I'm steeling myself for what's to come.
I find it wryly amusing that so many people are adamant that people will just go along with injecting their children because people put up with this for so long, when an awful lot of parents I know have put up with it this long because it's the best way they see that they can keep their children safe. Ex: I know an avid anti-masker who's kept wearing a mask to keep a job to get food for their kids; a number of people I know took the shots to be able to keep participating in events for their children; and the list goes on.
756 Illinois elementary schools will soon be hosting "mobile vaccination units" (I presume this means a fleet of vans) to start injecting children on school grounds.
Kamala Harris recently admitted in a seriously cringey video that COVID patients in hospitals are vaccinated and that most of the people who have died from COVID were vaccinated. The audience murmured with the equivalent of "Oh s**t" when she said this. They all knew she had just shot herself and the entire Covidian narrative in the foot. Then of course she smiled and laughed when she talked about putting shots in arms, which was absolutely the worst thing she could have done for PR.
If there's any upside, the study that TGP is referencing does seem to indicate that if you *have* to get the fox while pregnant, the later in pregnancy that happens, the safer it is. Before 20 weeks looks like a disaster, but the sample size is pretty small. It is bad enough that it should be setting off major alarm bells though, and send the thing back to the animal-testing phase until we know more.
I think there may have been GM mouse studies. But for pregnancy, they needed rhesus monkeys, or something like that. Mice don't make the same early-pregnancy chemical signals. Certain kinds of monkeys do. Definitely the appropriate testing has not been done, and the first-round human trials for pregnancy have now been done on women without informed consent. Note I'm not cheering on animal testing. I just think it's better than testing on pregnant women. In this case, it should never have got to the testing phase, because there are safe, effective, and cheap ways to treat the disease already.
There are rumors now of high rates of neonates with pulmonary hemorrhage, and heart problems. Waiting to see if those turn out to be real or just rumor.
There was that small Pfizer study in rats that found the treatment group had twice as many early losses as the control group, and there were some fetal malformations. That study was reported to the European Medicines Agency, not published AFAIK, and the EMA did not report any comparison of the rate of fetal malformations in the treatment group to that in the control group.
The EMA report (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf) said:
>There was an increase (~2x) of pre-implantation loss (9.77%, compared to control 4.09%) although this was within historical control data range (5.1%-11.5%). Among foetuses (from a total of n=21 dams/litters), there was a very low incidence of gastroschisis, mouth/jaw malformations, right sided aortic arch, and cervical vertebrae abnormalities, although these findings were within historical control data. Regarding skeletal findings, the exposed group had comparable to control group levels of presacral vertebral arches supernumerary lumbar ribs, supernumerary lumbar short ribs, caudal vertebrae number < 5). There were no signs of adverse effects on the postnatal pups (terminated at PND21). It is noted that there is currently no available data on the placental transfer of BNT162b2.
They really should have done testing with monkeys, though, because (as you said) their placenta is more similar to humans'.
Yeah, I saw that one. With mouse studies, it's just hard to tell if there's anything there. Suggestive? Yes. Conclusive? Far from it. So we're gonna muddle through this doing a giant medical experiment on pregnant women who've been assured it's totally safe.
It really does feel that way. Even if the rate of negative effects is vastly lower than thalidomide, it's been given to SO many more people! For a disease that was only ever dangerous people already on the brink of death anyway...
If we're still around in ten years, we'll be reading books about this, trying to understand it.
I don't think it takes a Nostradamus to see that the adolescents and teenagers of today are going to be the angry and disenfranchised Baby Bust childless of a decade or two from now. And that's the mildest of potential outcomes for them...
The cynical voice that resides in the back of my head making atavistic calculations says: if even half the horrible things they're saying about the foxes turn out to be true, then my unmodified organic children are going to have a much easier-than-anticipated time finding Nice Orthodox Spouses in 10-20 years. Particularly as the church prohibits most forms of assisted reproduction (no surrogates, no donor gametes, no IVF). Nothing like sweeping the competition off the field...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2021-11-04 12:53 am (UTC)As for the foxed, who are still coming down with COVID...they will find one way or another to blame it on us holdouts. I'm steeling myself for what's to come.
Joy Marie
no subject
Date: 2021-11-04 01:56 am (UTC)It's the mass vaccination campaign aimed at children that may finally put liberal heads on pikes.
no subject
Date: 2021-11-04 09:43 pm (UTC)Go after the kids, and all bets are off....
no subject
Date: 2021-11-05 09:11 pm (UTC)This does not end well at all.
no subject
Date: 2021-11-06 01:48 am (UTC)https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/hard-watch-hospital-ers-across-nation-completely-overwhelmed-non-covid-patients-sicker-ever-seen-nurses-forced-give-treatments-hallways-no/
no subject
Date: 2021-11-09 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-11-04 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-11-05 01:40 am (UTC)It never got animal testing in the first place....
no subject
Date: 2021-11-05 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-11-07 10:44 pm (UTC)There are rumors now of high rates of neonates with pulmonary hemorrhage, and heart problems. Waiting to see if those turn out to be real or just rumor.
no subject
Date: 2021-11-09 02:22 am (UTC)The EMA report (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf) said:
>There was an increase (~2x) of pre-implantation loss (9.77%, compared to control 4.09%) although this was within historical control data range (5.1%-11.5%). Among foetuses (from a total of n=21 dams/litters), there was a very low incidence of gastroschisis, mouth/jaw malformations, right sided aortic arch, and cervical vertebrae abnormalities, although these findings were within historical control data. Regarding skeletal findings, the exposed group had comparable to control group levels of presacral vertebral arches supernumerary lumbar ribs, supernumerary lumbar short ribs, caudal vertebrae number < 5). There were no signs of adverse effects on the postnatal pups (terminated at PND21). It is noted that there is currently no available data on the placental transfer of BNT162b2.
They really should have done testing with monkeys, though, because (as you said) their placenta is more similar to humans'.
no subject
Date: 2021-11-09 06:21 pm (UTC)It's not going to end well.
no subject
Date: 2021-11-09 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-11-09 07:53 pm (UTC)If we're still around in ten years, we'll be reading books about this, trying to understand it.
no subject
Date: 2021-11-10 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-11-10 08:52 pm (UTC)