Anyone see this yet? Worthy of consideration. Ties a number of loose ends I had in my head about events over the last ~2 yrs. It appears we're now approaching the phase whereby the 'vaccination program' will be more openly questioned in the mainstream.
About our impressions, and our predictions, this is in a nutshell what we’ve been writing:
The coronacircus psyop is more sophisticated than meets the eye. The Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Fauci, CNN narrative is the thesis. The Fox News, Sky News Australia, “China did it” narrative is the anti-thesis. The synthesis has yet to become fully apparent.
The coronacircus thesis is ultimately not supposed to be believed by most. In the end, people who still do are a side effect. It is a provocation; it is subversion; it is agitation propaganda; it is ultimately meant to cause outrage, unrest, and revolt. Ordo ab chao, solve et coagula.
More than a provocation, the coronacircus is an initiation ritual. A crowning ceremony; a rite of passage. The initiate, humanity, is being introduced into a new age; such rites always involve isolation (we got lockdowns), humiliation (we got masks), and evolution (we will get a manufactured awakening: stay tuned). The silver lining is a set of barbaric, medieval eschatological superstitions. The central planners have been working to bring about “the end of this age”, to “fulfill prophecy”. In order to see it, one needs to be familiar with the rituals, words, numbers and symbols they prefer; and even if one does, it is impossible to completely reverse engineer their superstitions; it is also useless to try; it’s enough to be aware of the phenomenon, and to look at it from a healthy distance.
In this context, we’ve introduced our readers to the revelation of the method concept, and the notion of accelerationism. We predicted the ineffectiveness of the injections would be revealed, as would their dangerosity. We argued this would not be a glitch, nor a manifestation of journalistic integrity; we insisted it would be part of the plan.
Rug Pull
The “rug pull theory” is how people who have now understood this have lately been calling it (examples one, two three, four, five, six, seven, archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
We appreciate the word getting out, because it means many won’t be fooled by the upcoming, manufactured unveiling (that last word is the literal etymological meaning of apocalypse). Others will be able to look back and understand such an unveiling was predicted.
Those who will choose to look back even further will notice the central planners themselves have announced it.
Below is a short video excerpt from the epilogue of Event 201, in which they predicted (in November 2019) that an upcoming coronavirus pandemic would cause “political upheaval [to become] the rule across the globe”, and that the public would “lose trust in their respective administrations”, leading to “several governments falling”, while others “were desperately striving to hold onto power”.
They add: “attempts to control media messaging, originally aimed only at health-related misinformation, became used increasingly to quash political dissent”, before predicting economic turmoil that could last a decade.
In conclusion they say “the loss of faith in government, the distrust of news, and the breakdown of social cohesion could last even longer [than a decade]”.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: "season of sacrifice
Date: 2022-02-18 02:34 am (UTC)Anyone see this yet? Worthy of consideration. Ties a number of loose ends I had in my head about events over the last ~2 yrs. It appears we're now approaching the phase whereby the 'vaccination program' will be more openly questioned in the mainstream.
https://coronacircus.com/2022/02/11/season-of-sacrifice/
A few excerpts:
About our impressions, and our predictions, this is in a nutshell what we’ve been writing:
The coronacircus psyop is more sophisticated than meets the eye. The Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Fauci, CNN narrative is the thesis. The Fox News, Sky News Australia, “China did it” narrative is the anti-thesis. The synthesis has yet to become fully apparent.
The coronacircus thesis is ultimately not supposed to be believed by most. In the end, people who still do are a side effect. It is a provocation; it is subversion; it is agitation propaganda; it is ultimately meant to cause outrage, unrest, and revolt. Ordo ab chao, solve et coagula.
More than a provocation, the coronacircus is an initiation ritual. A crowning ceremony; a rite of passage. The initiate, humanity, is being introduced into a new age; such rites always involve isolation (we got lockdowns), humiliation (we got masks), and evolution (we will get a manufactured awakening: stay tuned).
The silver lining is a set of barbaric, medieval eschatological superstitions. The central planners have been working to bring about “the end of this age”, to “fulfill prophecy”. In order to see it, one needs to be familiar with the rituals, words, numbers and symbols they prefer; and even if one does, it is impossible to completely reverse engineer their superstitions; it is also useless to try; it’s enough to be aware of the phenomenon, and to look at it from a healthy distance.
In this context, we’ve introduced our readers to the revelation of the method concept, and the notion of accelerationism. We predicted the ineffectiveness of the injections would be revealed, as would their dangerosity. We argued this would not be a glitch, nor a manifestation of journalistic integrity; we insisted it would be part of the plan.
Rug Pull
The “rug pull theory” is how people who have now understood this have lately been calling it (examples one, two three, four, five, six, seven, archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
We appreciate the word getting out, because it means many won’t be fooled by the upcoming, manufactured unveiling (that last word is the literal etymological meaning of apocalypse). Others will be able to look back and understand such an unveiling was predicted.
Those who will choose to look back even further will notice the central planners themselves have announced it.
Below is a short video excerpt from the epilogue of Event 201, in which they predicted (in November 2019) that an upcoming coronavirus pandemic would cause “political upheaval [to become] the rule across the globe”, and that the public would “lose trust in their respective administrations”, leading to “several governments falling”, while others “were desperately striving to hold onto power”.
They add: “attempts to control media messaging, originally aimed only at health-related misinformation, became used increasingly to quash political dissent”, before predicting economic turmoil that could last a decade.
In conclusion they say “the loss of faith in government, the distrust of news, and the breakdown of social cohesion could last even longer [than a decade]”.
------------------