Kimberly Steele (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
kimberlysteele) wrote2022-03-28 03:17 pm
kimberlysteele) wrote2022-03-28 03:17 pm
Entry tags:
Open Post for March 28, 2022
You can probably guess that I did not watch the Oscars Saturday night. I did not know about the Will Smith/Chris Rock kerfuffle until Sunday afternoon, and that's only because my husband heard about it through his social media feeds.
Something about the slap does not seem to be kosher. On the surface, one star gets incensed that the other star insulted his woman. The star doing the slapping just happens to be the It Boy, winning his first Oscar after decades on small and big screens. The It Boy happens to be a long-suffering cuckold whose domestic partner openly admitted to cheating on him in at least one major interview. Or so it would seem. There have been longstanding rumors that Jada Pinkett Smith is a beard, despite their children being conceived the usual way.
The real trouble for the Oscars and mainstream media in general is nobody is watching. The Oscars supposedly rallied and drew a larger audience this year after years of declining ratings. I have my doubts: I think the Oscars supposedly higher ratings are about as real as the record turnout for Biden in the 2020 elections. With every other Oscar winner being implicated or connected to Pedogate scandals while CRT and the woke agendas to pervert the development of six year olds rage on in public schools, the public has largely tuned out televised award ceremonies that rich people use to reward other rich people. Actors and singers we once turned to in order to be entertained are not entertaining. They're part of the darkness and oppression of woke culture. They're a drag. They're part of odious censorship and "I'm OK, you're OK, nothing to see here" propaganda. They're worse than boring. They're potentially evil. Regardless of whether or not it was real, I see the amplification of the Jada, Will, and Chris drama as a lame attempt to stir interest in a dying model of entertainment. Tune in next year to see who is assaulting who... that's the hoped-for response. Yawn.
Please refrain from swear words on this post. Other than that, have at it!
Something about the slap does not seem to be kosher. On the surface, one star gets incensed that the other star insulted his woman. The star doing the slapping just happens to be the It Boy, winning his first Oscar after decades on small and big screens. The It Boy happens to be a long-suffering cuckold whose domestic partner openly admitted to cheating on him in at least one major interview. Or so it would seem. There have been longstanding rumors that Jada Pinkett Smith is a beard, despite their children being conceived the usual way.
The real trouble for the Oscars and mainstream media in general is nobody is watching. The Oscars supposedly rallied and drew a larger audience this year after years of declining ratings. I have my doubts: I think the Oscars supposedly higher ratings are about as real as the record turnout for Biden in the 2020 elections. With every other Oscar winner being implicated or connected to Pedogate scandals while CRT and the woke agendas to pervert the development of six year olds rage on in public schools, the public has largely tuned out televised award ceremonies that rich people use to reward other rich people. Actors and singers we once turned to in order to be entertained are not entertaining. They're part of the darkness and oppression of woke culture. They're a drag. They're part of odious censorship and "I'm OK, you're OK, nothing to see here" propaganda. They're worse than boring. They're potentially evil. Regardless of whether or not it was real, I see the amplification of the Jada, Will, and Chris drama as a lame attempt to stir interest in a dying model of entertainment. Tune in next year to see who is assaulting who... that's the hoped-for response. Yawn.
Please refrain from swear words on this post. Other than that, have at it!
Re: The vaccinated
(Anonymous) 2022-04-02 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)I recently posted a hypothesis on Greer's covid blog that we may see a mass die-off/sickness event over the next 5 years or so.
I assume that the bulk of the triple/quadruple vaccinated will due or end up permanently sick/disabled. However, for those under 40, with previously healthy immune systems and who have had up to 2 genetic jabs, the majority should be ok, although a significant minority might still end of dead or sick.
Does your Ogham give any hint to whether the single/double jabbed, in particular the younger age groups who will have more robust immune systems, have a decent chance of surviving intact versus the triple/quadruple vaccinated who I understand will probably all die during this mass die-off.
Re: The vaccinated
Re: The vaccinated
(Anonymous) 2022-04-03 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)There are definitely reproductive risks but my point was that the young people, who got jabbed, are more likely to survive the potential mass-die off over the next 5 years.
On that note, I am watching, like a hawk, miscarriage rates among pregnant woman in 2022 who will be largely vaccinated. So far, so serious signs of problems, which is a huge relief, but have you come across anything to suggest that I'm wrong?
Re: The vaccinated
Here is a video: https://t.me/c/1411019203/1117
Re: The vaccinated
(Anonymous) 2022-04-03 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)I have posted my thoughts and referenced your blog on Greers sister website that covers Covid issues.
Whilst this is a terrifying prospect, I think somebody starts discussing it, given the warnings of scientists of their fears of the health of the vaccinated over a 5 year timeframe, that matches your ogham reading of a mass die-off in 2024/25.
Its less than 2 years away. A terrifying idea.
I will carry on praying that your Ogham reading is wrong.