kimberlysteele: (Default)
Kimberly Steele ([personal profile] kimberlysteele) wrote 2024-07-24 09:56 pm (UTC)

Yeah, timeline discussions invariably field Mandela Effect mentions which to my mind show us the limits of human thought. People simply cannot grok the possibility that the entire "rational" world is an illusion, a matrix, and a construct. To some degree, you can actually change the past for the better or worse based on how you shape your memories of it. Rhonda Byrne, like a broken clock, is right twice a day. You can bless the past by the power of seven (and exponentially improve it in certain ways) by deliberately recalling the positives of it. You can also make it worse by fixating on the negative, degrading it to the power of seven. Sometimes the Telephone Game/faulty memory results in different faulty memories; granted. However, sometimes Berenstein Bears and Berenstain Bears are both correct depending on who and where you were. There are some aspects that seem to remain unchanged or unchangeable, and that is where Rhonda Byrne gets it all wrong. You cannot change natural law. For instance, Rhonda Byrne herself likely thinks of herself as exempt from the karma of her own unearned wealth. I speculate that she will spend many, many lifetimes in slavery or being tortured and killed for the damage she did. Unearned wealth means you don't earn it this time around, but it won't save you in the future. The whole Fruit of the Loom/Berenstein thing though is a matter of perception. Our perception of this world isn't great to begin with: we can only "see" one plane, the physical one, and it only represents a tiny fragment of reality.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting